Matthew Cory and Jack Wong, representing Brooklin North Landowners Group, stated that they were working together on behalf of the Brooklin North Landowners Group. Mr. Cory advised that they have been working with Town Staff for the past three years on the Master Parks Agreement in Brooklin to dictate how the parks would be delivered. He advised that they have reviewed Report CMS 06-23 and were working with Staff to find solutions. He stated that their intent was to provide the best park space that they could. He noted that Bill 23 was not a guideline, but that it was the law, and that it was what could be required of developers who have not already submitted development applications. Mr. Cory agreed that planning policy framework has changed and that there was a need to change how parks were planned and delivered in Whitby. He stated that there has been a disconnect between the policies for parkland dedication and what can be provided in terms of facilities. He advised that they were committed to work with Staff to find optimized solutions and the best way to deliver parks in Brooklin. Mr. Cory requested that, in addition to the recommendation in the Staff report, Staff be directed to work with the landowners to find solutions for Brooklin, noting that there maybe different solutions other than smaller parks in Brooklin. He stated that there may be options to consolidate some of the larger parks to provide the play and sports facilities that residents want and expect. Mr. Cory stated that they were committed to develop the best they could in terms of community building and were seeking ways to do so. Mr. Wong stated that they were seeking alternate solutions that were specific to Brooklin to deliver a community that included the recreational needs required for the community.
A question and answer period ensued between Members of Committee and Staff regarding:
- the number of landowners in the Brooklin Landowners Groups willing to continue with five percent parkland dedication versus the minimum requirement, and whether any of the landowners were willing to dedicate more than the minimum required under Bill 23;
- whether the Master Parks Agreement was signed by the landowners and whether it would need to be reviewed/revised due to Bill 23; and,
- the willingness of landowners to work with the proposal by Staff to provide cash-in-lieu of parkland in areas where the Town may be unable to construct a park to assist with offsetting the cost to acquire land for sports field parks.
It was the consensus of the Committee to hear Item 6.4.3, CMS 06-23, at this time.